- SA Set No 139
- SA Set No 132
- SA Set No 131
- SA Set No 130
- SA Set No 129
- SA Set No 128
- SA Set No 127
- SA Set No 126
- SA Set No 125
- SA Set No 124
- SA Set No 123
- SA Set No 122
- SA Set No 121
- SA Set No 120
- SA Set No 119
- SA Set No 118
- SA Set No 117
- SA Set No 116
- SA Set No 112
- SA Set No 111
- SA Set No 110
- SA Set No 109
- SA Set No 108
- SA Set No 107
- SA Set No 106
- SA Set No 105
- SA Set No 104
- SA Set No 103
- SA Set No 102
- SA Set No 101
- SA Set No 100
- SA Set No 99
- SA Set No 97
- SA Set No 96
- SA Set No 95
- SA Set No 94
- SA Set No 93
- SA Set No 92
- SA Set No 91
- SA Set No 90
- SA Set No 89
- SA Set No 88
- SA Set No 87
- SA Set No 86
- SA Set No 85
- SA Set No 84
- SA Set No 83
- SA Set No 82
- SA Set No 81
- SA Set No 80
- SA Set No 79
- SA Set No 78
- SA Set No 77
- SA Set No 76
- SA Set No 75
- SA Set No 74
- SA Set No 73
- SA Set No 72
- SA Set No 71
- SA Set No 70
- SA Set No 69
- SA Set No 68
- SA Set No 67
- SA Set No 66
- SA Set No 65
- SA Set No 64
- SA Set No 52
- SA Set No 51
- SA Set No 50
- SA Set No 49
- SA Set No 46
- Set No 25
- Set No 24
- Set No 23
- Set No 22
- Set No 21

Eight friends Anab, Manov, Bayaz, Takbir, Neaha, Pakija, Qumila and Vitna went to State bank of India for depositing different amount in their savings accounts and they all were asked to sit around a circular table facing outside the centre. All of them had different amount (in Rs) to deposit such as 4000, 6000, 15000, 1000, 2000, 3000, 9000 and 7000, but not necessarily in the same order.

The one who has the lowest amount to deposit sits opposite to the one who has the highest amount to deposit. Qumila deposited an amount which is sum of the amount deposited by his/her immediate neighbors. The one who deposited thrice the amount of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna. Pakija is an immediate neighbor of Neaha and Vitna. Pakija is neither an immediate neighbor of the one who deposited 6000 nor of the one who deposited 9000. Only one person sits between Vitna and the one who has an amount 9000 to deposit. The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6. There are as many person(s) sitting between the one who has the lowest amount to deposit and Vitna as sitting between Neaha and Anab. Qumila has the highest amount to deposit in the savings account. The amount deposited by Vitna is not a multiple of 6. The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit. The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

Important for :

1

E

Following the common explanation, we get **"None of these".**

Pakija = 1000 Manov = 9000 Average = [1000+9000] / 2 = 10000 / 2 = Rs.5000

Pakija = 1000 Manov = 9000 Average = [1000+9000] / 2 = 10000 / 2 = Rs.5000

Hence, option B is correct.

Different amounts to deposit are 4000, 6000, 15000, 1000, 2000, 3000, 9000 and 7000.

The one who has lowest amount to deposit sits opposite to the one who has highest amount to deposit.

Qumila has the highest amount to deposit in the savings account.

Qumila deposited an amount which is sum of the amount deposited by his/her immediate neighbors.

Only one person sits between Vitna and the one who has an amount 9000 to deposit.

The amount deposited by Vitna is not a multiple of 6.

Based on the given statements, we calculate the amount to be deposited at bank by 8 persons.

Lowest Amount given = 1000 Highest Amount given = 15000 Qumila deposited highest amount |
Then Qumila = 15000 Rssits opposite to the onewho has 1000 Rs |

We know Qumila = 15000 (It is the sum of his/her immediate neighbors) |
To get, Sum = 15000 6000 + 9000 = 15000 (Only possible combination in givenamount) So, the persons depositing 6000 & 9000 are the immediate neighbors of Qumila |

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

The one who deposited thrice the amount of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna.

Pakija is an immediate neighbor of Neaha and Vitna.

Pakija is neither an immediate neighbor of the one who deposited 6000 nor of the one who deposited 9000.

From above two cases, we see that Vitna sits opposite to Rs.6000

Given, thrice the amount (3 times) of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna. Only amount to get 3 times is Rs.2000

So clearly, Vitna has Rs.2000 and sits opposite to the one who has (3*2000 = Rs.6000)

Based on remaining statements, we get

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

There are as many person(s) sitting between the one who has the lowest amount to deposit and Vitna as sitting between Neaha and Anab.

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6.

The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit.

__Inferences__

From both cases, Pakija has the lowest amount = Rs 1000

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6.

The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit.

From both cases, Pakija has the lowest amount = Rs 1000

No one sits between Pakija (lowest amount) and Vitna. No one sits between Neaha and Anab.

Thus Anab sits immediate right of Neaha (in Case 1) and Anab sits immediate left of Neaha (case 2).

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

If Anab =6000, Vitna =2000 Then Takbir = 6000+2000 = 8000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

If Anab=9000, Vitna = 2000 Then Takbir = 9000 + 2000 =11000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

Case 1 |
Case 2 [Eliminated as the one who has deposited 7000, sits to the immediate left of Anab.] |

Thus final arrangement can be obtained from

2

A

Following the common explanation, we get **"Takbir-6000".**

Hence, option A is correct.

Hence, option A is correct.

Different amounts to deposit are 4000, 6000, 15000, 1000, 2000, 3000, 9000 and 7000.

The one who has lowest amount to deposit sits opposite to the one who has highest amount to deposit.

Qumila has the highest amount to deposit in the savings account.

Qumila deposited an amount which is sum of the amount deposited by his/her immediate neighbors.

Only one person sits between Vitna and the one who has an amount 9000 to deposit.

The amount deposited by Vitna is not a multiple of 6.

Based on the given statements, we calculate the amount to be deposited at bank by 8 persons.

Lowest Amount given = 1000 Highest Amount given = 15000 Qumila deposited highest amount |
Then Qumila = 15000 Rssits opposite to the onewho has 1000 Rs |

We know Qumila = 15000 (It is the sum of his/her immediate neighbors) |
To get, Sum = 15000 6000 + 9000 = 15000 (Only possible combination in givenamount) So, the persons depositing 6000 & 9000 are the immediate neighbors of Qumila |

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

The one who deposited thrice the amount of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna.

Pakija is an immediate neighbor of Neaha and Vitna.

Pakija is neither an immediate neighbor of the one who deposited 6000 nor of the one who deposited 9000.

From above two cases, we see that Vitna sits opposite to Rs.6000

Given, thrice the amount (3 times) of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna. Only amount to get 3 times is Rs.2000

So clearly, Vitna has Rs.2000 and sits opposite to the one who has (3*2000 = Rs.6000)

Based on remaining statements, we get

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

There are as many person(s) sitting between the one who has the lowest amount to deposit and Vitna as sitting between Neaha and Anab.

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6.

The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit.

__Inferences__

From both cases, Pakija has the lowest amount = Rs 1000

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6.

The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit.

From both cases, Pakija has the lowest amount = Rs 1000

No one sits between Pakija (lowest amount) and Vitna. No one sits between Neaha and Anab.

Thus Anab sits immediate right of Neaha (in Case 1) and Anab sits immediate left of Neaha (case 2).

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

If Anab =6000, Vitna =2000 Then Takbir = 6000+2000 = 8000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

If Anab=9000, Vitna = 2000 Then Takbir = 9000 + 2000 =11000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

Case 1 |
Case 2 [Eliminated as the one who has deposited 7000, sits to the immediate left of Anab.] |

Thus final arrangement can be obtained from

3

B

Following the common explanation, we get **"3rd left of 6000(Takbir) is Pakija"**

Hence, option B is correct.

Hence, option B is correct.

Different amounts to deposit are 4000, 6000, 15000, 1000, 2000, 3000, 9000 and 7000.

The one who has lowest amount to deposit sits opposite to the one who has highest amount to deposit.

Qumila has the highest amount to deposit in the savings account.

Qumila deposited an amount which is sum of the amount deposited by his/her immediate neighbors.

Only one person sits between Vitna and the one who has an amount 9000 to deposit.

The amount deposited by Vitna is not a multiple of 6.

Based on the given statements, we calculate the amount to be deposited at bank by 8 persons.

Lowest Amount given = 1000 Highest Amount given = 15000 Qumila deposited highest amount |
Then Qumila = 15000 Rssits opposite to the onewho has 1000 Rs |

We know Qumila = 15000 (It is the sum of his/her immediate neighbors) |
To get, Sum = 15000 6000 + 9000 = 15000 (Only possible combination in givenamount) So, the persons depositing 6000 & 9000 are the immediate neighbors of Qumila |

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

The one who deposited thrice the amount of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna.

Pakija is an immediate neighbor of Neaha and Vitna.

Pakija is neither an immediate neighbor of the one who deposited 6000 nor of the one who deposited 9000.

From above two cases, we see that Vitna sits opposite to Rs.6000

Given, thrice the amount (3 times) of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna. Only amount to get 3 times is Rs.2000

So clearly, Vitna has Rs.2000 and sits opposite to the one who has (3*2000 = Rs.6000)

Based on remaining statements, we get

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

There are as many person(s) sitting between the one who has the lowest amount to deposit and Vitna as sitting between Neaha and Anab.

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6.

The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit.

__Inferences__

From both cases, Pakija has the lowest amount = Rs 1000

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6.

The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit.

From both cases, Pakija has the lowest amount = Rs 1000

No one sits between Pakija (lowest amount) and Vitna. No one sits between Neaha and Anab.

Thus Anab sits immediate right of Neaha (in Case 1) and Anab sits immediate left of Neaha (case 2).

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

If Anab =6000, Vitna =2000 Then Takbir = 6000+2000 = 8000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

If Anab=9000, Vitna = 2000 Then Takbir = 9000 + 2000 =11000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

Case 1 |
Case 2 [Eliminated as the one who has deposited 7000, sits to the immediate left of Anab.] |

Thus final arrangement can be obtained from

4

E

Following the common explanation, we get **"Neaha deposited Rs.7000".**

Hence, option E is correct.

Hence, option E is correct.

Different amounts to deposit are 4000, 6000, 15000, 1000, 2000, 3000, 9000 and 7000.

The one who has lowest amount to deposit sits opposite to the one who has highest amount to deposit.

Qumila has the highest amount to deposit in the savings account.

Qumila deposited an amount which is sum of the amount deposited by his/her immediate neighbors.

Only one person sits between Vitna and the one who has an amount 9000 to deposit.

The amount deposited by Vitna is not a multiple of 6.

Based on the given statements, we calculate the amount to be deposited at bank by 8 persons.

Lowest Amount given = 1000 Highest Amount given = 15000 Qumila deposited highest amount |
Then Qumila = 15000 Rssits opposite to the onewho has 1000 Rs |

We know Qumila = 15000 (It is the sum of his/her immediate neighbors) |
To get, Sum = 15000 6000 + 9000 = 15000 (Only possible combination in givenamount) So, the persons depositing 6000 & 9000 are the immediate neighbors of Qumila |

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

The one who deposited thrice the amount of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna.

Pakija is an immediate neighbor of Neaha and Vitna.

Pakija is neither an immediate neighbor of the one who deposited 6000 nor of the one who deposited 9000.

From above two cases, we see that Vitna sits opposite to Rs.6000

Given, thrice the amount (3 times) of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna. Only amount to get 3 times is Rs.2000

So clearly, Vitna has Rs.2000 and sits opposite to the one who has (3*2000 = Rs.6000)

Based on remaining statements, we get

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6.

The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit.

From both cases, Pakija has the lowest amount = Rs 1000

No one sits between Pakija (lowest amount) and Vitna. No one sits between Neaha and Anab.

Thus Anab sits immediate right of Neaha (in Case 1) and Anab sits immediate left of Neaha (case 2).

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

If Anab =6000, Vitna =2000 Then Takbir = 6000+2000 = 8000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

If Anab=9000, Vitna = 2000 Then Takbir = 9000 + 2000 =11000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

Case 1 |
Case 2 [Eliminated as the one who has deposited 7000, sits to the immediate left of Anab.] |

Thus final arrangement can be obtained from

5

B

Following the common explanation, we get **"2nd left of Neaha-Vitna (2000 Rs Deposited)"**

Hence, option B is correct.

Hence, option B is correct.

Different amounts to deposit are 4000, 6000, 15000, 1000, 2000, 3000, 9000 and 7000.

The one who has lowest amount to deposit sits opposite to the one who has highest amount to deposit.

Qumila has the highest amount to deposit in the savings account.

Qumila deposited an amount which is sum of the amount deposited by his/her immediate neighbors.

Only one person sits between Vitna and the one who has an amount 9000 to deposit.

The amount deposited by Vitna is not a multiple of 6.

Based on the given statements, we calculate the amount to be deposited at bank by 8 persons.

Lowest Amount given = 1000 Highest Amount given = 15000 Qumila deposited highest amount |
Then Qumila = 15000 Rssits opposite to the onewho has 1000 Rs |

We know Qumila = 15000 (It is the sum of his/her immediate neighbors) |
To get, Sum = 15000 6000 + 9000 = 15000 (Only possible combination in givenamount) So, the persons depositing 6000 & 9000 are the immediate neighbors of Qumila |

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

The one who deposited thrice the amount of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna.

Pakija is an immediate neighbor of Neaha and Vitna.

Pakija is neither an immediate neighbor of the one who deposited 6000 nor of the one who deposited 9000.

From above two cases, we see that Vitna sits opposite to Rs.6000

Given, thrice the amount (3 times) of Vitna sits opposite to Vitna. Only amount to get 3 times is Rs.2000

So clearly, Vitna has Rs.2000 and sits opposite to the one who has (3*2000 = Rs.6000)

Based on remaining statements, we get

Case 1 |
Case 2 |

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

The sum of the amount deposited by Anab and Vitna is equal to the amount deposited by Takbir, whose amount is multiple of 6.

The person Bayaz has only 3000 Rupees to deposit.

From both cases, Pakija has the lowest amount = Rs 1000

No one sits between Pakija (lowest amount) and Vitna. No one sits between Neaha and Anab.

Thus Anab sits immediate right of Neaha (in Case 1) and Anab sits immediate left of Neaha (case 2).

The one who has amount 7000 to deposit sits immediate left of Anab.

If Anab =6000, Vitna =2000 Then Takbir = 6000+2000 = 8000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

If Anab=9000, Vitna = 2000 Then Takbir = 9000 + 2000 =11000 (not multiple of 6, so not possible)

Case 1 |
Case 2 [Eliminated as the one who has deposited 7000, sits to the immediate left of Anab.] |

Thus final arrangement can be obtained from

Seating Arrangement is one of the topics that forms the base of any bank examination. Be it SBI PO or IBPS PO, IBPS Clerk or SBI Clerk, RRB Office Assistant or RRB Officer Scale I, RBI Grade B or IBPS SO. Not just in bank exams, but Insurance sector exams also feature questions on seating arrangement. Seating arrangement questions are commonly seen in exams like NIACL Assistant Pre, NIACL Assistant Mains, LIC HFL, UIIC etc. At this page, you will get all the questions based on new pattern seating arrangement that has been asked in several exams like SBI Clerk Mains 2018, SBI PO Mains 2018 and RRB Office Assistant Mains 2018. Seating arrangement questions are completely based on verbal reasoning where questions are solved by applying verbal statements in a logical order. You can find new pattern seating arrangement questions with solutions that can help you to derive at the answer quickly. The unmatched explanations will help the aspirants to build their concepts. In seating arrangement questions the most important point is to build a strategy for which the given information is to be utilized in a logical manner. It is very important to use the direct hints first and then put up the other information. After placing the direct hints, use the information connected with the direct hints to get the answer. This strategy will help to reach the answer in fastest possible time, which is the key to crack a competitive exam. In SBI Clerk Mains 2018, the major portion of the reasoning section was occupied with seating arrangements. There were almost all types of seating arrangement questions like Linear seating arrangement, Circular seating arrangement, Floor based seating arrangement and Rectangular seating arrangement. So, this itself tells the importance of Seating arrangement questions in upcoming bank exams, insurance exams and even CLAT 2019. Practice one test daily at www.smartkeeda.com to achieve excellence and master the critical topic of reasoning i.e. Seating Arrangement. Here, you will get linear seating arrangement questions, circular seating arrangement questions, floor based seating arrangement and rectangular based seating arrangement questions with detailed solutions. Take one quiz daily to build a strong command over all types of seating arrangement questions because in today’s competition age it is essential to have good command over all the four sections that come in bank exams. Start your preparation with the most relevant questions at www.smartkeeda.com and don’t forget to attempt test series on SBI PO Pre+Mains, SBI Clerk Pre+Mains and IBPS PO Pre+Mains, IBPS Clerk Pre+Mains available at testzone.