# High Level Linear Seating Arrangement Puzzle for SBI PO 2019 and IBPS PO 2019 | Reasoning Puzzles PDF at Smartkeeda

Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:

Irfan, Harish, Govind, Francis, Edwin, Diwan, Chandra, Bala and Ashwin are sitting in two parallel rows. Each row has six seats. Nine persons are sitting in nine seats and there are three vacant seats. Therefore in the given arrangement, each member seated in a row faces another member of the other row or vacant seat. Vacant seats are not facing each other. Each of them like different mobile phones like Redmi, Lenovo, Samsung, Sony, Micromax, Moto, Asus, Oppo and Vivo. The person sit in row-1 facing south direction and the person sit in row-2 facing north direction. Row-1 is followed by Row-2. All the above information is not necessarily in the same order.

The person, who is sitting third to the right of Diwan, is facing the person or vacant seat who/which is immediate right of the one who likes Oppo. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats. Only one person sits between the one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo. Diwan and the one who likes Samsung are facing each other. Edwin is second to the right of the one who likes Sony. One who likes Lenovo and the one who likes Moto are immediate neighbors of each other. Ashwin, who likes Micromax, is not sitting adjacent to any of the vacant seats. One who likes Lenovo and one who likes Vivo are facing each other. Harish and Irfan, who likes Samsung, are diagonally opposite to each other. The number of persons to the right of Edwin and the number of persons to the left of Francis are same. Diwan likes Sony mobile phone. One, who likes Redmi, sits third to the right of the one who likes Lenovo. Bala likes neither Oppo nor Asus. Chandra sits right of Govind, who does not face south direction.
Important for :
1
Who among the following persons likes Asus mobile phone?
» Explain it
A
The following common explanation, we get "Asus-Francis".

Hence, option A is correct.

Final table:

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Common Explanation

References:

1. Harish and Irfan, who likes Samsung, are diagonally opposite to each other.

2. Diwan and the one who likes Samsung are facing each other.

3. Diwan likes Sony mobile phone.

4. The person, who is sitting third to the right of Diwan, is facing the person or vacant seat who/which is immediate right of the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

From point 1, 2, 3 we get Irfan likes Samsung phone and Diwan likes Sony Phone & both are sitting opposite to each other [either north or south direction]

Note: Irfan, Harish & Diwan all are sitting at extreme ends.

With reference to 4th point, Diwan can sit at either extreme left end of Row-1 (South direction) or extreme left end of Row-2 (North direction), by this we get two possibilities.

Case:1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-1 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-2 (diagonally opposite

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Diwan Mobile Sony Mobile Oppo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

Case: 1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-2 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-1 (diagonally opposite to each other) & Diwan sits opposite to Irfan. By using above information we get the initial seating as follows,

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Oppo Mobile Sony Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Harish

References:

1. Edwin is second to the right of the one who likes Sony.

2. One who likes Lenovo and the one who likes Moto are immediate neighbors of each other.

3. One who likes Lenovo and one who likes Vivo are facing each other.

4. One, who likes Redmi, sits third to the right of the one who likes Lenovo.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 1, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-1 & faces south direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-1 & Case-1-A]

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 2, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-2 & faces north direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-2 & Case-2-A]

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

Only one person sits between the one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-1, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo One person should sit Asus Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-1-A, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-2, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-2, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 2 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan One person should sit Mobile Samsung Vivo Asus Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

1. The number of persons to the right of Edwin and the number of persons to the left of Francis are same.

2. Ashwin, who likes Micromax, is not sitting adjacent to any of the vacant seats.

3. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

4. Chandra sits right of Govind, who does not face south direction.

5. Bala likes neither Oppo nor Asus.

6. Vacant seats are not facing each other.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 1st point, number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Because there should be 3 vacant seats in the arrangement. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis must also be 2 in both case-1-A & Case-1-B

If we observe the case-1-A & Case-1-B, 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons.

Now up to the given condition, let check the possibilities:

Note: Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

Case: 1-A: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

With the last hint we know that two vacant seats can't face each other, so the only left person Ashwin must face the vacant seat of row 2. So, the first and second vacant seats are there in the row 2, but there should be a total of 3 vacant seats as only 9 people are sitting, thus the third vacant seat is beside Ashwin, which will violate the 2nd reference point.

Both the vacant seats should be adjacent to Govind, with reference to the 3rd reference point which says that Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] When Bala is immediate left of Edwin. No place for Ashwin to sit Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Ashwin-X Edwin Bala Diwan Mobile Redmi Lenovo Moto Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Case: 1-B: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

Neither vacant seats are facing each other nor Ashwin is a neighbor of vacant seat. All the conditions are satisfied.

 Case: 1-B When Bala is immediate right of Edwin Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

If we observe the case-2-A & Case-2-B 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons

Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats. But in both the cases only one seat can be filled by either Chandra or Govind. If Chandra or Govind sit in a new place in Row-2 (a seat which is not occupied by mobile phone), then total seats exceed 9 which is not possible. Hence both the following cases can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] - Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Francis Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto Lenovo Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-B [Eliminated] -Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

Clearly, only case 1-B satisfies all the given hints, thus the final arrangement will be obtained through Case 1-B.

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

2
Which of the following combinations is definitely true?
» Explain it
B
The following common explanation, we get "Govind-Oppo".

Hence, option B is correct.

Final table:

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Common Explanation

References:

1. Harish and Irfan, who likes Samsung, are diagonally opposite to each other.

2. Diwan and the one who likes Samsung are facing each other.

3. Diwan likes Sony mobile phone.

4. The person, who is sitting third to the right of Diwan, is facing the person or vacant seat who/which is immediate right of the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

From point 1, 2, 3 we get Irfan likes Samsung phone and Diwan likes Sony Phone & both are sitting opposite to each other [either north or south direction]

Note: Irfan, Harish & Diwan all are sitting at extreme ends.

With reference to 4th point, Diwan can sit at either extreme left end of Row-1 (South direction) or extreme left end of Row-2 (North direction), by this we get two possibilities.

Case:1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-1 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-2 (diagonally opposite

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Diwan Mobile Sony Mobile Oppo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

Case: 1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-2 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-1 (diagonally opposite to each other) & Diwan sits opposite to Irfan. By using above information we get the initial seating as follows,

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Oppo Mobile Sony Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Harish

References:

1. Edwin is second to the right of the one who likes Sony.

2. One who likes Lenovo and the one who likes Moto are immediate neighbors of each other.

3. One who likes Lenovo and one who likes Vivo are facing each other.

4. One, who likes Redmi, sits third to the right of the one who likes Lenovo.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 1, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-1 & faces south direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-1 & Case-1-A]

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 2, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-2 & faces north direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-2 & Case-2-A]

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

Only one person sits between the one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-1, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo One person should sit Asus Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-1-A, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-2, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-2, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 2 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan One person should sit Mobile Samsung Vivo Asus Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

1. The number of persons to the right of Edwin and the number of persons to the left of Francis are same.

2. Ashwin, who likes Micromax, is not sitting adjacent to any of the vacant seats.

3. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

4. Chandra sits right of Govind, who does not face south direction.

5. Bala likes neither Oppo nor Asus.

6. Vacant seats are not facing each other.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 1st point, number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Because there should be 3 vacant seats in the arrangement. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis must also be 2 in both case-1-A & Case-1-B

If we observe the case-1-A & Case-1-B, 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons.

Now up to the given condition, let check the possibilities:

Note: Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

Case: 1-A: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

With the last hint we know that two vacant seats can't face each other, so the only left person Ashwin must face the vacant seat of row 2. So, the first and second vacant seats are there in the row 2, but there should be a total of 3 vacant seats as only 9 people are sitting, thus the third vacant seat is beside Ashwin, which will violate the 2nd reference point.

Both the vacant seats should be adjacent to Govind, with reference to the 3rd reference point which says that Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] When Bala is immediate left of Edwin. No place for Ashwin to sit Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Ashwin-X Edwin Bala Diwan Mobile Redmi Lenovo Moto Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Case: 1-B: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

Neither vacant seats are facing each other nor Ashwin is a neighbor of vacant seat. All the conditions are satisfied.

 Case: 1-B When Bala is immediate right of Edwin Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

If we observe the case-2-A & Case-2-B 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons

Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats. But in both the cases only one seat can be filled by either Chandra or Govind. If Chandra or Govind sit in a new place in Row-2 (a seat which is not occupied by mobile phone), then total seats exceed 9 which is not possible. Hence both the following cases can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] - Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Francis Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto Lenovo Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-B [Eliminated] -Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

Clearly, only case 1-B satisfies all the given hints, thus the final arrangement will be obtained through Case 1-B.

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

3
How many persons sit between the one who likes Redmi and the one who likes Sony?
» Explain it
B
The following common explanation, we get "Only three persons".

Hence, option B is correct.

Final table:

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Common Explanation

References:

1. Harish and Irfan, who likes Samsung, are diagonally opposite to each other.

2. Diwan and the one who likes Samsung are facing each other.

3. Diwan likes Sony mobile phone.

4. The person, who is sitting third to the right of Diwan, is facing the person or vacant seat who/which is immediate right of the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

From point 1, 2, 3 we get Irfan likes Samsung phone and Diwan likes Sony Phone & both are sitting opposite to each other [either north or south direction]

Note: Irfan, Harish & Diwan all are sitting at extreme ends.

With reference to 4th point, Diwan can sit at either extreme left end of Row-1 (South direction) or extreme left end of Row-2 (North direction), by this we get two possibilities.

Case:1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-1 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-2 (diagonally opposite

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Diwan Mobile Sony Mobile Oppo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

Case: 1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-2 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-1 (diagonally opposite to each other) & Diwan sits opposite to Irfan. By using above information we get the initial seating as follows,

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Oppo Mobile Sony Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Harish

References:

1. Edwin is second to the right of the one who likes Sony.

2. One who likes Lenovo and the one who likes Moto are immediate neighbors of each other.

3. One who likes Lenovo and one who likes Vivo are facing each other.

4. One, who likes Redmi, sits third to the right of the one who likes Lenovo.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 1, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-1 & faces south direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-1 & Case-1-A]

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 2, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-2 & faces north direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-2 & Case-2-A]

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

Only one person sits between the one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-1, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo One person should sit Asus Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-1-A, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-2, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-2, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 2 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan One person should sit Mobile Samsung Vivo Asus Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

1. The number of persons to the right of Edwin and the number of persons to the left of Francis are same.

2. Ashwin, who likes Micromax, is not sitting adjacent to any of the vacant seats.

3. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

4. Chandra sits right of Govind, who does not face south direction.

5. Bala likes neither Oppo nor Asus.

6. Vacant seats are not facing each other.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 1st point, number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Because there should be 3 vacant seats in the arrangement. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis must also be 2 in both case-1-A & Case-1-B

If we observe the case-1-A & Case-1-B, 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons.

Now up to the given condition, let check the possibilities:

Note: Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

Case: 1-A: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

With the last hint we know that two vacant seats can't face each other, so the only left person Ashwin must face the vacant seat of row 2. So, the first and second vacant seats are there in the row 2, but there should be a total of 3 vacant seats as only 9 people are sitting, thus the third vacant seat is beside Ashwin, which will violate the 2nd reference point.

Both the vacant seats should be adjacent to Govind, with reference to the 3rd reference point which says that Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] When Bala is immediate left of Edwin. No place for Ashwin to sit Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Ashwin-X Edwin Bala Diwan Mobile Redmi Lenovo Moto Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Case: 1-B: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

Neither vacant seats are facing each other nor Ashwin is a neighbor of vacant seat. All the conditions are satisfied.

 Case: 1-B When Bala is immediate right of Edwin Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

If we observe the case-2-A & Case-2-B 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons

Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats. But in both the cases only one seat can be filled by either Chandra or Govind. If Chandra or Govind sit in a new place in Row-2 (a seat which is not occupied by mobile phone), then total seats exceed 9 which is not possible. Hence both the following cases can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] - Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Francis Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto Lenovo Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-B [Eliminated] -Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

Clearly, only case 1-B satisfies all the given hints, thus the final arrangement will be obtained through Case 1-B.

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

4
The person who sits second to the left of Francis is facing whom among the following persons?
» Explain it
E
The following common explanation, we get "None of these, Vacant seat".

Second to the left of Francis is Govind & Govind faces vacant seat.

Hence, option E is correct.

Final table:

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Common Explanation

References:

1. Harish and Irfan, who likes Samsung, are diagonally opposite to each other.

2. Diwan and the one who likes Samsung are facing each other.

3. Diwan likes Sony mobile phone.

4. The person, who is sitting third to the right of Diwan, is facing the person or vacant seat who/which is immediate right of the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

From point 1, 2, 3 we get Irfan likes Samsung phone and Diwan likes Sony Phone & both are sitting opposite to each other [either north or south direction]

Note: Irfan, Harish & Diwan all are sitting at extreme ends.

With reference to 4th point, Diwan can sit at either extreme left end of Row-1 (South direction) or extreme left end of Row-2 (North direction), by this we get two possibilities.

Case:1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-1 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-2 (diagonally opposite

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Diwan Mobile Sony Mobile Oppo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

Case: 1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-2 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-1 (diagonally opposite to each other) & Diwan sits opposite to Irfan. By using above information we get the initial seating as follows,

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Oppo Mobile Sony Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Harish

References:

1. Edwin is second to the right of the one who likes Sony.

2. One who likes Lenovo and the one who likes Moto are immediate neighbors of each other.

3. One who likes Lenovo and one who likes Vivo are facing each other.

4. One, who likes Redmi, sits third to the right of the one who likes Lenovo.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 1, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-1 & faces south direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-1 & Case-1-A]

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 2, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-2 & faces north direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-2 & Case-2-A]

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

Only one person sits between the one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-1, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo One person should sit Asus Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-1-A, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-2, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-2, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 2 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan One person should sit Mobile Samsung Vivo Asus Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

1. The number of persons to the right of Edwin and the number of persons to the left of Francis are same.

2. Ashwin, who likes Micromax, is not sitting adjacent to any of the vacant seats.

3. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

4. Chandra sits right of Govind, who does not face south direction.

5. Bala likes neither Oppo nor Asus.

6. Vacant seats are not facing each other.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 1st point, number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Because there should be 3 vacant seats in the arrangement. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis must also be 2 in both case-1-A & Case-1-B

If we observe the case-1-A & Case-1-B, 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons.

Now up to the given condition, let check the possibilities:

Note: Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

Case: 1-A: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

With the last hint we know that two vacant seats can't face each other, so the only left person Ashwin must face the vacant seat of row 2. So, the first and second vacant seats are there in the row 2, but there should be a total of 3 vacant seats as only 9 people are sitting, thus the third vacant seat is beside Ashwin, which will violate the 2nd reference point.

Both the vacant seats should be adjacent to Govind, with reference to the 3rd reference point which says that Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] When Bala is immediate left of Edwin. No place for Ashwin to sit Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Ashwin-X Edwin Bala Diwan Mobile Redmi Lenovo Moto Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Case: 1-B: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

Neither vacant seats are facing each other nor Ashwin is a neighbor of vacant seat. All the conditions are satisfied.

 Case: 1-B When Bala is immediate right of Edwin Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

If we observe the case-2-A & Case-2-B 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons

Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats. But in both the cases only one seat can be filled by either Chandra or Govind. If Chandra or Govind sit in a new place in Row-2 (a seat which is not occupied by mobile phone), then total seats exceed 9 which is not possible. Hence both the following cases can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] - Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Francis Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto Lenovo Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-B [Eliminated] -Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

Clearly, only case 1-B satisfies all the given hints, thus the final arrangement will be obtained through Case 1-B.

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

5
Who among the following sits opposite to the person who sits third to the left of Edwin?
» Explain it
D
The following common explanation, we get Irfan sits opposite to the person who sits third to the left of Edwin.

Hence, option E is correct.

Final table:

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Common Explanation

References:

1. Harish and Irfan, who likes Samsung, are diagonally opposite to each other.

2. Diwan and the one who likes Samsung are facing each other.

3. Diwan likes Sony mobile phone.

4. The person, who is sitting third to the right of Diwan, is facing the person or vacant seat who/which is immediate right of the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

From point 1, 2, 3 we get Irfan likes Samsung phone and Diwan likes Sony Phone & both are sitting opposite to each other [either north or south direction]

Note: Irfan, Harish & Diwan all are sitting at extreme ends.

With reference to 4th point, Diwan can sit at either extreme left end of Row-1 (South direction) or extreme left end of Row-2 (North direction), by this we get two possibilities.

Case:1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-1 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-2 (diagonally opposite

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Diwan Mobile Sony Mobile Oppo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

Case: 1 Harish sits at extreme right end of row-2 and Irfan sits at extreme right end of row-1 (diagonally opposite to each other) & Diwan sits opposite to Irfan. By using above information we get the initial seating as follows,

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Oppo Mobile Sony Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Harish

References:

1. Edwin is second to the right of the one who likes Sony.

2. One who likes Lenovo and the one who likes Moto are immediate neighbors of each other.

3. One who likes Lenovo and one who likes Vivo are facing each other.

4. One, who likes Redmi, sits third to the right of the one who likes Lenovo.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 1, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-1 & faces south direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-1 & Case-1-A]

 Case: 1 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

With reference to 4th point, in Case: 2, the one who likes Lenovo must in Row-2 & faces north direction to satisfy the reference points 2 & 3. But we get two possibilities as shown in seating arrangement. [i.e. Case-2 & Case-2-A]

 Case: 2 Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Mobile Samsung Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

Only one person sits between the one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo.

Inferences:

From above information,

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-1, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Sony Mobile Oppo One person should sit Asus Vivo Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-1-A, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 1-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Edwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Sony Mobile Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Irfan

In Case-2, the one who likes Asus sits on the 2nd left of Irfan & there must be one person sit between one who likes Asus and the one who likes Oppo as per statement. But if we observe the case-2, 10 seats are occupied by person or mobile phone which is not possible. Hence this case can be eliminated.

 Case: 2 [Eliminated] Total occupied seats exceed 9. Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan One person should sit Mobile Samsung Vivo Asus Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

In Case-1, the one who likes Asus sits on the immediate left of Irfan, by this the seat which is on the immediate right of the one who likes Oppo becomes Vacant as per given statement and it is shown in seating.

 Case: 2-A Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto/ Lenovo Moto/ Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

References:

1. The number of persons to the right of Edwin and the number of persons to the left of Francis are same.

2. Ashwin, who likes Micromax, is not sitting adjacent to any of the vacant seats.

3. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

4. Chandra sits right of Govind, who does not face south direction.

5. Bala likes neither Oppo nor Asus.

6. Vacant seats are not facing each other.

Inferences:

From above information,

With reference to 1st point, number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Because there should be 3 vacant seats in the arrangement. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis must also be 2 in both case-1-A & Case-1-B

If we observe the case-1-A & Case-1-B, 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons.

Now up to the given condition, let check the possibilities:

Note: Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

Case: 1-A: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

With the last hint we know that two vacant seats can't face each other, so the only left person Ashwin must face the vacant seat of row 2. So, the first and second vacant seats are there in the row 2, but there should be a total of 3 vacant seats as only 9 people are sitting, thus the third vacant seat is beside Ashwin, which will violate the 2nd reference point.

Both the vacant seats should be adjacent to Govind, with reference to the 3rd reference point which says that Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] When Bala is immediate left of Edwin. No place for Ashwin to sit Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Ashwin-X Edwin Bala Diwan Mobile Redmi Lenovo Moto Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

Case: 1-B: To satisfy the reference point-1, Francis must like Asus; by this number of persons to the right of Edwin is 2. Therefore number of persons to the left of Francis is also 2. Then, Govind likes Oppo and Chandra likes Vivo. Then Bala must like Moto (Bala doesn’t like Oppo or Asus).

Neither vacant seats are facing each other nor Ashwin is a neighbor of vacant seat. All the conditions are satisfied.

 Case: 1-B When Bala is immediate right of Edwin Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

If we observe the case-2-A & Case-2-B 8 seats are occupied either with person or mobile and the remaining one seat is filled by Ashwin, who likes Micromax phone. From this we clearly understood that, Bala, Govind, Chandra and Francis must like Oppo, Vivo, Asus and Moto but not necessarily in the same order. I.e. No new seats can be occupied by these 4 persons

Chandra sits right of Govind and both are facing north direction. Govind is an immediate neighbor of vacant seats. But in both the cases only one seat can be filled by either Chandra or Govind. If Chandra or Govind sit in a new place in Row-2 (a seat which is not occupied by mobile phone), then total seats exceed 9 which is not possible. Hence both the following cases can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] - Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Francis Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Moto Lenovo Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

 Case: 2-B [Eliminated] -Govind does not face south Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Irfan Vacant Mobile Samsung Asus Vivo Oppo Mobile Sony Lenovo Moto Redmi Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Diwan Edwin Harish

Clearly, only case 1-B satisfies all the given hints, thus the final arrangement will be obtained through Case 1-B.

 Case: 1-B Row – 1 (Person) ↓ Harish Vacant Bala Edwin Ashwin Diwan Mobile Redmi Moto Lenovo Micromax Sony Mobile Vacant Oppo Vacant Vivo Asus Samsung Row – 2 (Person) ↑ Govind Chandra Francis Irfan

##### You may also like to study

Are you looking for any of these?

seating arrangement tricks for sbi po 2019

circular seating arrangement questions

seating arrangement puzzle for ibps po 2019

seating arrangement questions pdf

seating arrangement affairscloud

seating arrangement questions for bank po

seating arrangement questions for ibps clerk pdf

seating arrangement questions for sbi clerk

seating arrangement questions pdf with answers for sbi po

seating arrangement tricks for ibps po 2019

circular seating arrangement questions for ibps clerk 2019

high level seating arrangement questions for bank po 2019

New Pattern based seating arrangement questions for sbi po 2019

Seating Arrangement Puzzle Quiz No. 81

Seating Arrangement is one of the topics that forms the base of any bank examination. Be it SBI PO or IBPS PO, IBPS Clerk or SBI Clerk, RRB Office Assistant or RRB Officer Scale I, RBI Grade B or IBPS SO. Not just in bank exams, but Insurance sector exams also feature questions on seating arrangement. Seating arrangement questions are commonly seen in exams like NIACL Assistant Pre, NIACL Assistant Mains, LIC HFL, UIIC etc.  At this page, you will get all the questions based on new pattern seating arrangement that has been asked in several exams like SBI Clerk Mains 2018, SBI PO Mains 2018 and RRB Office Assistant Mains 2018. Seating arrangement questions are completely based on verbal reasoning where questions are solved by applying verbal statements in a logical order. You can find new pattern seating arrangement questions with solutions that can help you to derive at the answer quickly. The unmatched explanations will help the aspirants to build their concepts. In seating arrangement questions the most important point is to build a strategy for which the given information is to be utilized in a logical manner. It is very important to use the direct hints first and then put up the other information. After placing the direct hints, use the information connected with the direct hints to get the answer. This strategy will help to reach the answer in fastest possible time, which is the key to crack a competitive exam. In SBI Clerk Mains 2018, the major portion of the reasoning section was occupied with seating arrangements. There were almost all types of seating arrangement questions like Linear seating arrangement, Circular seating arrangement, Floor based seating arrangement and Rectangular seating arrangement. So, this itself tells the importance of Seating arrangement questions in upcoming bank exams, insurance exams and even CLAT 2019. Practice one test daily at www.smartkeeda.com to achieve excellence and master the critical topic of reasoning i.e. Seating Arrangement. Here, you will get linear seating arrangement questions, circular seating arrangement questions, floor based seating arrangement and rectangular based seating arrangement questions with detailed solutions. Take one quiz daily to build a strong command over all types of seating arrangement questions because in today’s competition age it is essential to have good command over all the four sections that come in bank exams. Start your preparation with the most relevant questions at www.smartkeeda.com and don’t forget to attempt test series on SBI PO Pre+Mains, SBI Clerk Pre+Mains and IBPS PO Pre+Mains, IBPS Clerk Pre+Mains available at testzone.