# New Pattern High Level Seating Arrangement for SBI PO 2019 and IBPS PO 2019 | New Pattern Reasoning Puzzles PDF at Smartkeeda

Directions: Read the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.

Eight soldiers from A to G of Indian Army were seated around a round table facing towards the centre. They were of different ranks and have killed different number of terrorists in an under cover operation.

Below given is the distribution of soldiers as per descending order of their ranks.

H(24) > C(68) > F(74) > B(31) > A(79) > D(20) > E(52) > G(82)

Some additional information is given below:

A is neither adjacent to the one whose rank is the lowest nor to the one whose rank is the second highest. The second highest ranked soldier was sitting opposite to the one who killed the highest number of terrorists. F was immediate right of the soldier who was third lowest in rank. The one who killed the fourth lowest number of terrorists was sitting between G and the one who was third highest ranked. D and the one whose number of terrorists killed is a prime number were sitting opposite to each other.
Important for :
1
Who was third to the left of the one who killed second highest number of terrorists?
» Explain it
B
E (the one whose rank is second lowest) was third to the left of the one who killed second highest number of terrorists i.e. A.

Hence option B is correct.

Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:

Reference:

Below given is the distribution of soldiers as per descending order of their ranks.

H(24) > C(68) > F(74) > B(31) > A(79) > D(20) > E(52) > G(82)

Inference:

While solving the puzzle we will keep this information in mind.

Reference:

The second highest ranked soldier was sitting opposite to the one who killed the highest number of terrorists.
A is neither adjacent to the one whose rank is the lowest nor to the one whose rank is the second highest.

Inference:

The second highest ranked soldier is C and the one who killed the highest number of terrorists is G, thus, C and G sit opposite to each other.
As per the second hint we have only two positions left for A as shown in Case 1 and Case2.

Reference:

The one who killed the fourth lowest number of terrorists was sitting between G and the one who was third highest ranked.
F was immediate right of the soldier who was third lowest in rank.

Inference:

The one who killed fourth lowest number of terrorists is E and the one who is third highest ranked is F.
So, E sits between G and F.
The third lowest ranked soldier is D.

Case 2 fails here, as there is no place for D to sit as per the second hint.
Reference:

D and the one whose number of terrorists killed is a prime number were sitting opposite to each other.

Inference:

There are two terrorists whose number of terrorists killed is prime number viz. B (31) and A (79).
But we have already positioned A as secon to the left of C, thus B will be seated opposite to D.

The only vacant place is occupied by H. Thus the final seating arrangement looks like below.

2
Four of the following five are alike in a certain way and thus form a group. Which of the following does not belong to the group?
» Explain it
D
A-F is the odd one out as F is fourth to the right of A, whereas in all other options the second person is third to the right of first person.

Hence option D is correct.

Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:

Reference:

Below given is the distribution of soldiers as per descending order of their ranks.

H(24) > C(68) > F(74) > B(31) > A(79) > D(20) > E(52) > G(82)

Inference:

While solving the puzzle we will keep this information in mind.

Reference:

The second highest ranked soldier was sitting opposite to the one who killed the highest number of terrorists.
A is neither adjacent to the one whose rank is the lowest nor to the one whose rank is the second highest.

Inference:

The second highest ranked soldier is C and the one who killed the highest number of terrorists is G, thus, C and G sit opposite to each other.
As per the second hint we have only two positions left for A as shown in Case 1 and Case2.

Reference:

The one who killed the fourth lowest number of terrorists was sitting between G and the one who was third highest ranked.
F was immediate right of the soldier who was third lowest in rank.

Inference:

The one who killed fourth lowest number of terrorists is E and the one who is third highest ranked is F.
So, E sits between G and F.
The third lowest ranked soldier is D.

Case 2 fails here, as there is no place for D to sit as per the second hint.
Reference:

D and the one whose number of terrorists killed is a prime number were sitting opposite to each other.

Inference:

There are two terrorists whose number of terrorists killed is prime number viz. B (31) and A (79).
But we have already positioned A as secon to the left of C, thus B will be seated opposite to D.

The only vacant place is occupied by H. Thus the final seating arrangement looks like below.

3
Who was seated opposite to E?
» Explain it
A
The one who killed second lowest number of terrorists i.e. H sits opposite to E.

Hence option A is correct.

Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:

Reference:

Below given is the distribution of soldiers as per descending order of their ranks.

H(24) > C(68) > F(74) > B(31) > A(79) > D(20) > E(52) > G(82)

Inference:

While solving the puzzle we will keep this information in mind.

Reference:

The second highest ranked soldier was sitting opposite to the one who killed the highest number of terrorists.
A is neither adjacent to the one whose rank is the lowest nor to the one whose rank is the second highest.

Inference:

The second highest ranked soldier is C and the one who killed the highest number of terrorists is G, thus, C and G sit opposite to each other.
As per the second hint we have only two positions left for A as shown in Case 1 and Case2.

Reference:

The one who killed the fourth lowest number of terrorists was sitting between G and the one who was third highest ranked.
F was immediate right of the soldier who was third lowest in rank.

Inference:

The one who killed fourth lowest number of terrorists is E and the one who is third highest ranked is F.
So, E sits between G and F.
The third lowest ranked soldier is D.

Case 2 fails here, as there is no place for D to sit as per the second hint.
Reference:

D and the one whose number of terrorists killed is a prime number were sitting opposite to each other.

Inference:

There are two terrorists whose number of terrorists killed is prime number viz. B (31) and A (79).
But we have already positioned A as secon to the left of C, thus B will be seated opposite to D.

The only vacant place is occupied by H. Thus the final seating arrangement looks like below.

4
Which of the following statements is false?
» Explain it
B
H sits adjacent to the one who killed lowest number of terrorists is false statement.

Hence option B is correct.

Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:

Reference:

Below given is the distribution of soldiers as per descending order of their ranks.

H(24) > C(68) > F(74) > B(31) > A(79) > D(20) > E(52) > G(82)

Inference:

While solving the puzzle we will keep this information in mind.

Reference:

The second highest ranked soldier was sitting opposite to the one who killed the highest number of terrorists.
A is neither adjacent to the one whose rank is the lowest nor to the one whose rank is the second highest.

Inference:

The second highest ranked soldier is C and the one who killed the highest number of terrorists is G, thus, C and G sit opposite to each other.
As per the second hint we have only two positions left for A as shown in Case 1 and Case2.

Reference:

The one who killed the fourth lowest number of terrorists was sitting between G and the one who was third highest ranked.
F was immediate right of the soldier who was third lowest in rank.

Inference:

The one who killed fourth lowest number of terrorists is E and the one who is third highest ranked is F.
So, E sits between G and F.
The third lowest ranked soldier is D.

Case 2 fails here, as there is no place for D to sit as per the second hint.
Reference:

D and the one whose number of terrorists killed is a prime number were sitting opposite to each other.

Inference:

There are two terrorists whose number of terrorists killed is prime number viz. B (31) and A (79).
But we have already positioned A as secon to the left of C, thus B will be seated opposite to D.

The only vacant place is occupied by H. Thus the final seating arrangement looks like below.

5
Who were the immediate neighbours of the one who killed the lowest number of terrorists?
» Explain it
C
C and F are the immediate neighbours of the one who killed the lowest number of terrorists i.e. D.

Hence option C is correct.

Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:

Reference:

Below given is the distribution of soldiers as per descending order of their ranks.

H(24) > C(68) > F(74) > B(31) > A(79) > D(20) > E(52) > G(82)

Inference:

While solving the puzzle we will keep this information in mind.

Reference:

The second highest ranked soldier was sitting opposite to the one who killed the highest number of terrorists.
A is neither adjacent to the one whose rank is the lowest nor to the one whose rank is the second highest.

Inference:

The second highest ranked soldier is C and the one who killed the highest number of terrorists is G, thus, C and G sit opposite to each other.
As per the second hint we have only two positions left for A as shown in Case 1 and Case2.

Reference:

The one who killed the fourth lowest number of terrorists was sitting between G and the one who was third highest ranked.
F was immediate right of the soldier who was third lowest in rank.

Inference:

The one who killed fourth lowest number of terrorists is E and the one who is third highest ranked is F.
So, E sits between G and F.
The third lowest ranked soldier is D.

Case 2 fails here, as there is no place for D to sit as per the second hint.
Reference:

D and the one whose number of terrorists killed is a prime number were sitting opposite to each other.

Inference:

There are two terrorists whose number of terrorists killed is prime number viz. B (31) and A (79).
But we have already positioned A as secon to the left of C, thus B will be seated opposite to D.

The only vacant place is occupied by H. Thus the final seating arrangement looks like below.

##### You may also like to study

Are you looking for any of these?

seating arrangement tricks for sbi po 2019

circular seating arrangement questions

seating arrangement puzzle for ibps po 2019

seating arrangement questions pdf

seating arrangement affairscloud

seating arrangement questions for bank po

seating arrangement questions for ibps clerk pdf

seating arrangement questions for sbi clerk

seating arrangement questions pdf with answers for sbi po

seating arrangement tricks for ibps po 2019

circular seating arrangement questions for ibps clerk 2019

high level seating arrangement questions for bank po 2019

New Pattern based seating arrangement questions for sbi po 2019

Seating Arrangement Puzzle Quiz No. 84

Seating Arrangement is one of the topics that forms the base of any bank examination. Be it SBI PO or IBPS PO, IBPS Clerk or SBI Clerk, RRB Office Assistant or RRB Officer Scale I, RBI Grade B or IBPS SO. Not just in bank exams, but Insurance sector exams also feature questions on seating arrangement. Seating arrangement questions are commonly seen in exams like NIACL Assistant Pre, NIACL Assistant Mains, LIC HFL, UIIC etc.  At this page, you will get all the questions based on new pattern seating arrangement that has been asked in several exams like SBI Clerk Mains 2018, SBI PO Mains 2018 and RRB Office Assistant Mains 2018. Seating arrangement questions are completely based on verbal reasoning where questions are solved by applying verbal statements in a logical order. You can find new pattern seating arrangement questions with solutions that can help you to derive at the answer quickly. The unmatched explanations will help the aspirants to build their concepts. In seating arrangement questions the most important point is to build a strategy for which the given information is to be utilized in a logical manner. It is very important to use the direct hints first and then put up the other information. After placing the direct hints, use the information connected with the direct hints to get the answer. This strategy will help to reach the answer in fastest possible time, which is the key to crack a competitive exam. In SBI Clerk Mains 2018, the major portion of the reasoning section was occupied with seating arrangements. There were almost all types of seating arrangement questions like Linear seating arrangement, Circular seating arrangement, Floor based seating arrangement and Rectangular seating arrangement. So, this itself tells the importance of Seating arrangement questions in upcoming bank exams, insurance exams and even CLAT 2019. Practice one test daily at www.smartkeeda.com to achieve excellence and master the critical topic of reasoning i.e. Seating Arrangement. Here, you will get linear seating arrangement questions, circular seating arrangement questions, floor based seating arrangement and rectangular based seating arrangement questions with detailed solutions. Take one quiz daily to build a strong command over all types of seating arrangement questions because in today’s competition age it is essential to have good command over all the four sections that come in bank exams. Start your preparation with the most relevant questions at www.smartkeeda.com and don’t forget to attempt test series on SBI PO Pre+Mains, SBI Clerk Pre+Mains and IBPS PO Pre+Mains, IBPS Clerk Pre+Mains available at testzone.