# Reasoning Linear Seating Arrangement Puzzle for SBI PO Pre 2019, IBPS Clerk Mains 2018, IBPS PO Pre 2019 and other Bank Exams

Directions: Read the given information carefully and answer the questions given beside:

Ten friends Amol, Darsh, Farhan, Isaac, Jason, Kabir, Laksh, Neel, Samar and Ranbir are sitting in two parallel rows. Each row has six seats. Ten people are sitting on ten seats and there are two vacant seats. Therefore in the given seating arrangement each member seated in a row faces another member of the other row. In Row-1, all are facing south and in Row-2 all are facing north direction. In each row at least one vacant seat is there. Each of them likes different food namely Almond, Bread, Corn, Fish, Gumbo, Hot Dogs, Moose, Ostrich, Reuben and Toast. All the above information is not necessarily in the same order.

Neel sits second to the left of Isaac, who sits opposite to the one who like Reuben. The one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who likes Fish. Jason sits third to the right of the one who likes Toast. The one who likes Almond sits immediate right of Isaac. Laksh sits second to the right of vacant seat of Row-1. Ranbir sits opposite to the one who is an immediate neighbour of Farhan. Two persons sit between the one who likes Reuben and the one who likes Moose, who sits at extreme end. Vacant seats are not at the extreme end. The one who likes Fish is sitting at extreme end. The one who likes Corn and the one who likes Ostrich sit opposite to each other. The one who likes Toast and the one who likes Gumbo sit opposite to each other. Samar sits second to the left of Kabir and does not like either Reuben or Gumbo. The one who likes Fish and the one who likes Bread sit diagonally opposite to each other. Only one person sits between Amol and Ranbir.
Important for :
1
Who sits second to the left of the one who likes Ostrich?
» Explain it
B
The following common explanation, we get "Ranbir".

Amol like Ostrich and his/her 2nd left is Ranbir.

Hence, option B is correct.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

Common Explanation

References

Therefore in the given seating arrangement each members seated in a row faces another members of the other row.

In Row-1, all are facing south and in Row-2 all are facing north direction.

Two persons sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end.

Neel sits second to the left of Isaac, who sits opposite to the one who like Reuben.

The one who like Almond sits immediate right of Isaac.

Inferences

From above statements,

 ● Note: Given, all the persons are facing each other, then vacant seats also opposite to each other. ● Also, we don’t know who are all in each rows. So we have to solve based on the possibility. ● The one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end. Here we get 4 possibilities

Based on the other statements, we get following initial seating as shown,

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Reuben Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 1-A Row-1 (South) Food Reuben Moose Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Reuben Moose

 Case: 2-A Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose Reuben

Note: All the above cases are possible; only if two people are sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. If there is vacant seat in between, then the position of the one like Reuben gets changed, with that all the others position also gets changed.

References

The one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.

The one who like Fish and the one who like Bread sits diagonally opposite to each other.

The one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish.

The one who like Corn and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to each other.

Vacant seats are not in the extreme end.

Inferences

From above statements,

• By combining all above information, the following seating we obtained are
• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.
1. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
2. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme right end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
3. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is possible. But all the 5 seats (In Row-2) from left are filled by this statement. Then the vacant seat comes at extreme right end, which is not possible. So Case-1 is not possible with respect to above statements.

Note: All the above conditions explained (the one who like Fish, at end) is applicable for all above 4 cases. It means that, we can’t continue all the above 4 cases as it is. From, here we clearly observe that the vacant seat is in between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. So we have to change all above 4 cases (1, 1-A, 2 & 2-A) with respect to the one who like Reuben.

• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-1 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving]

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Reuben Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (1-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Reuben/ Ostrich Moose/Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (2), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving ]

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case (2-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose/ Bread Reuben / Ostrich

Note: Out of 4 cases, two are eliminated and two (Case-1 & 2) are left to continue.

References

Laksh sits second to the right of Row-1, vacant seat.

Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast.

The one who like Toast and the one who like Gumbo sits opposite to each other.

Inferences

From above statements,

• In Case-1, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 3rd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 3rd from the right end.
• Laksh sits on the immediate right of the one who like Ostrich.
• Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Vacant Reuben Bread Persons Laksh Persons Neel Vacant Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case-2, we get two possibilities for vacant seats in both rows as shown in table. The vacant seat in Row-1 is 4th from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 4th from the right end. Laksh likes Almond sit extreme right end of Row-1. Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 2[Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Almond Vacant Corn Fish Persons Laksh Isaac Neel Persons Vacant Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case-2-B, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 2nd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 2nd from the right end. Laksh sits on the immediate right of Neel. Here Jason likes Moose sit at extreme right end of the Row-2. Laksh like Gumbo and sits opposite to the one who like Toast.

By using above all information, we get the following case-2-B as shown below.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Isaac Laksh Neel Persons Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

References

Samar sits second to the left of Kabir and does not like either Reuben or Gumbo.

Only one person sits between Amol and Ranbir.

Ranbir sits opposite to the one who is an immediate neighbor of Farhan.

Inferences

From above statements

• Samar likes Bread & sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and Kabir likes Toast (Only possibility)
• Ranbir likes Reuben and Amol likes Ostrich (Only possibility with 3rd reference pint)
• Farhan likes Almond and his immediate neighbor is Isaac & Isaac faces Ranbir. So the given condition satisfied.
• Finally, Isaac likes Hot Dogs and Darsh likes Fish. Thus we get completed arrangement of all persons.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose
2
How many persons sit between the one who like Gumbo and the one who sit opposite to Jason?
» Explain it
A
The following common explanation, we get "One".

Laksh like Gumbo & Darsh (Opposite of Jason).

In between Laksh and Darsh, 1 person sitting & 1 vacant seat is there.

Hence, option A is correct.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

Common Explanation

References

Therefore in the given seating arrangement each members seated in a row faces another members of the other row.

In Row-1, all are facing south and in Row-2 all are facing north direction.

Two persons sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end.

Neel sits second to the left of Isaac, who sits opposite to the one who like Reuben.

The one who like Almond sits immediate right of Isaac.

Inferences

From above statements,

 ● Note: Given, all the persons are facing each other, then vacant seats also opposite to each other. ● Also, we don’t know who are all in each rows. So we have to solve based on the possibility. ● The one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end. Here we get 4 possibilities

Based on the other statements, we get following initial seating as shown,

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Reuben Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 1-A Row-1 (South) Food Reuben Moose Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Reuben Moose

 Case: 2-A Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose Reuben

Note: All the above cases are possible; only if two people are sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. If there is vacant seat in between, then the position of the one like Reuben gets changed, with that all the others position also gets changed.

References

The one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.

The one who like Fish and the one who like Bread sits diagonally opposite to each other.

The one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish.

The one who like Corn and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to each other.

Vacant seats are not in the extreme end.

Inferences

From above statements,

• By combining all above information, the following seating we obtained are
• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.
1. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
2. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme right end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
3. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is possible. But all the 5 seats (In Row-2) from left are filled by this statement. Then the vacant seat comes at extreme right end, which is not possible. So Case-1 is not possible with respect to above statements.

Note: All the above conditions explained (the one who like Fish, at end) is applicable for all above 4 cases. It means that, we can’t continue all the above 4 cases as it is. From, here we clearly observe that the vacant seat is in between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. So we have to change all above 4 cases (1, 1-A, 2 & 2-A) with respect to the one who like Reuben.

• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-1 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving]

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Reuben Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (1-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Reuben/ Ostrich Moose/Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (2), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving ]

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case (2-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose/ Bread Reuben / Ostrich

Note: Out of 4 cases, two are eliminated and two (Case-1 & 2) are left to continue.

References

Laksh sits second to the right of Row-1, vacant seat.

Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast.

The one who like Toast and the one who like Gumbo sits opposite to each other.

Inferences

From above statements,

• In Case-1, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 3rd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 3rd from the right end.
• Laksh sits on the immediate right of the one who like Ostrich.
• Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Vacant Reuben Bread Persons Laksh Persons Neel Vacant Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case-2, we get two possibilities for vacant seats in both rows as shown in table. The vacant seat in Row-1 is 4th from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 4th from the right end. Laksh likes Almond sit extreme right end of Row-1. Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 2[Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Almond Vacant Corn Fish Persons Laksh Isaac Neel Persons Vacant Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case-2-B, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 2nd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 2nd from the right end. Laksh sits on the immediate right of Neel. Here Jason likes Moose sit at extreme right end of the Row-2. Laksh like Gumbo and sits opposite to the one who like Toast.

By using above all information, we get the following case-2-B as shown below.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Isaac Laksh Neel Persons Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

References

Samar sits second to the left of Kabir and does not like either Reuben or Gumbo.

Only one person sits between Amol and Ranbir.

Ranbir sits opposite to the one who is an immediate neighbor of Farhan.

Inferences

From above statements

• Samar likes Bread & sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and Kabir likes Toast (Only possibility)
• Ranbir likes Reuben and Amol likes Ostrich (Only possibility with 3rd reference pint)
• Farhan likes Almond and his immediate neighbor is Isaac & Isaac faces Ranbir. So the given condition satisfied.
• Finally, Isaac likes Hot Dogs and Darsh likes Fish. Thus we get completed arrangement of all persons.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose
3
Who sits second to the right of the one who sits opposite to the one who like Almond?
» Explain it
D
The following common explanation, we get "Kabir".

Farhan like Almond & Opposite of Farhan is Samar. Kabir is 2nd to the right of Samar

Hence, option D is correct.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

Common Explanation

References

Therefore in the given seating arrangement each members seated in a row faces another members of the other row.

In Row-1, all are facing south and in Row-2 all are facing north direction.

Two persons sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end.

Neel sits second to the left of Isaac, who sits opposite to the one who like Reuben.

The one who like Almond sits immediate right of Isaac.

Inferences

From above statements,

 ● Note: Given, all the persons are facing each other, then vacant seats also opposite to each other. ● Also, we don’t know who are all in each rows. So we have to solve based on the possibility. ● The one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end. Here we get 4 possibilities

Based on the other statements, we get following initial seating as shown,

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Reuben Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 1-A Row-1 (South) Food Reuben Moose Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Reuben Moose

 Case: 2-A Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose Reuben

Note: All the above cases are possible; only if two people are sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. If there is vacant seat in between, then the position of the one like Reuben gets changed, with that all the others position also gets changed.

References

The one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.

The one who like Fish and the one who like Bread sits diagonally opposite to each other.

The one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish.

The one who like Corn and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to each other.

Vacant seats are not in the extreme end.

Inferences

From above statements,

• By combining all above information, the following seating we obtained are
• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.
1. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
2. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme right end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
3. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is possible. But all the 5 seats (In Row-2) from left are filled by this statement. Then the vacant seat comes at extreme right end, which is not possible. So Case-1 is not possible with respect to above statements.

Note: All the above conditions explained (the one who like Fish, at end) is applicable for all above 4 cases. It means that, we can’t continue all the above 4 cases as it is. From, here we clearly observe that the vacant seat is in between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. So we have to change all above 4 cases (1, 1-A, 2 & 2-A) with respect to the one who like Reuben.

• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-1 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving]

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Reuben Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (1-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Reuben/ Ostrich Moose/Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (2), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving ]

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case (2-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose/ Bread Reuben / Ostrich

Note: Out of 4 cases, two are eliminated and two (Case-1 & 2) are left to continue.

References

Laksh sits second to the right of Row-1, vacant seat.

Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast.

The one who like Toast and the one who like Gumbo sits opposite to each other.

Inferences

From above statements,

• In Case-1, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 3rd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 3rd from the right end.
• Laksh sits on the immediate right of the one who like Ostrich.
• Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Vacant Reuben Bread Persons Laksh Persons Neel Vacant Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case-2, we get two possibilities for vacant seats in both rows as shown in table. The vacant seat in Row-1 is 4th from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 4th from the right end. Laksh likes Almond sit extreme right end of Row-1. Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 2[Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Almond Vacant Corn Fish Persons Laksh Isaac Neel Persons Vacant Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case-2-B, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 2nd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 2nd from the right end. Laksh sits on the immediate right of Neel. Here Jason likes Moose sit at extreme right end of the Row-2. Laksh like Gumbo and sits opposite to the one who like Toast.

By using above all information, we get the following case-2-B as shown below.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Isaac Laksh Neel Persons Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

References

Samar sits second to the left of Kabir and does not like either Reuben or Gumbo.

Only one person sits between Amol and Ranbir.

Ranbir sits opposite to the one who is an immediate neighbor of Farhan.

Inferences

From above statements

• Samar likes Bread & sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and Kabir likes Toast (Only possibility)
• Ranbir likes Reuben and Amol likes Ostrich (Only possibility with 3rd reference pint)
• Farhan likes Almond and his immediate neighbor is Isaac & Isaac faces Ranbir. So the given condition satisfied.
• Finally, Isaac likes Hot Dogs and Darsh likes Fish. Thus we get completed arrangement of all persons.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose
4
Which of the combinations of persons are seated in same row?
» Explain it
E
The following common explanation, we get "Isaac, Darsh, Farhan" are seated in Row-1

Hence, option E is correct.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

Common Explanation

References

Therefore in the given seating arrangement each members seated in a row faces another members of the other row.

In Row-1, all are facing south and in Row-2 all are facing north direction.

Two persons sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end.

Neel sits second to the left of Isaac, who sits opposite to the one who like Reuben.

The one who like Almond sits immediate right of Isaac.

Inferences

From above statements,

 ● Note: Given, all the persons are facing each other, then vacant seats also opposite to each other. ● Also, we don’t know who are all in each rows. So we have to solve based on the possibility. ● The one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end. Here we get 4 possibilities

Based on the other statements, we get following initial seating as shown,

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Reuben Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 1-A Row-1 (South) Food Reuben Moose Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Reuben Moose

 Case: 2-A Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose Reuben

Note: All the above cases are possible; only if two people are sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. If there is vacant seat in between, then the position of the one like Reuben gets changed, with that all the others position also gets changed.

References

The one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.

The one who like Fish and the one who like Bread sits diagonally opposite to each other.

The one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish.

The one who like Corn and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to each other.

Vacant seats are not in the extreme end.

Inferences

From above statements,

• By combining all above information, the following seating we obtained are
• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.
1. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
2. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme right end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
3. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is possible. But all the 5 seats (In Row-2) from left are filled by this statement. Then the vacant seat comes at extreme right end, which is not possible. So Case-1 is not possible with respect to above statements.

Note: All the above conditions explained (the one who like Fish, at end) is applicable for all above 4 cases. It means that, we can’t continue all the above 4 cases as it is. From, here we clearly observe that the vacant seat is in between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. So we have to change all above 4 cases (1, 1-A, 2 & 2-A) with respect to the one who like Reuben.

• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-1 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving]

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Reuben Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (1-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Reuben/ Ostrich Moose/Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (2), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving ]

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case (2-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose/ Bread Reuben / Ostrich

Note: Out of 4 cases, two are eliminated and two (Case-1 & 2) are left to continue.

References

Laksh sits second to the right of Row-1, vacant seat.

Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast.

The one who like Toast and the one who like Gumbo sits opposite to each other.

Inferences

From above statements,

• In Case-1, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 3rd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 3rd from the right end.
• Laksh sits on the immediate right of the one who like Ostrich.
• Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Vacant Reuben Bread Persons Laksh Persons Neel Vacant Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case-2, we get two possibilities for vacant seats in both rows as shown in table. The vacant seat in Row-1 is 4th from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 4th from the right end. Laksh likes Almond sit extreme right end of Row-1. Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 2[Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Almond Vacant Corn Fish Persons Laksh Isaac Neel Persons Vacant Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case-2-B, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 2nd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 2nd from the right end. Laksh sits on the immediate right of Neel. Here Jason likes Moose sit at extreme right end of the Row-2. Laksh like Gumbo and sits opposite to the one who like Toast.

By using above all information, we get the following case-2-B as shown below.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Isaac Laksh Neel Persons Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

References

Samar sits second to the left of Kabir and does not like either Reuben or Gumbo.

Only one person sits between Amol and Ranbir.

Ranbir sits opposite to the one who is an immediate neighbor of Farhan.

Inferences

From above statements

• Samar likes Bread & sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and Kabir likes Toast (Only possibility)
• Ranbir likes Reuben and Amol likes Ostrich (Only possibility with 3rd reference pint)
• Farhan likes Almond and his immediate neighbor is Isaac & Isaac faces Ranbir. So the given condition satisfied.
• Finally, Isaac likes Hot Dogs and Darsh likes Fish. Thus we get completed arrangement of all persons.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose
5
Four of the following five are alike in a certain way and hence form a group. Which of the following does not belong to the group?
» Explain it
C
The following common explanation, we get "Laksh and the one who like Bread".

Explanation: Laksh & his Opposite person is Kabir. Kabir’s 2nd left is Samar. Samar likes Bread [i.e Laksh and Opposite Person’s 2nd left is Paired].

Remaining 4 options are paired,

Person and Opposite Person’s 2nd Right Example: Farhan opposite is Samar. Samar’s 2nd right is Kabir. Kabir likes Toast.

Hence, option C is correct.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

Common Explanation

References

Therefore in the given seating arrangement each members seated in a row faces another members of the other row.

In Row-1, all are facing south and in Row-2 all are facing north direction.

Two persons sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end.

Neel sits second to the left of Isaac, who sits opposite to the one who like Reuben.

The one who like Almond sits immediate right of Isaac.

Inferences

From above statements,

 ● Note: Given, all the persons are facing each other, then vacant seats also opposite to each other. ● Also, we don’t know who are all in each rows. So we have to solve based on the possibility. ● The one who like Moose, who sits at extreme end. Here we get 4 possibilities

Based on the other statements, we get following initial seating as shown,

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Reuben Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 1-A Row-1 (South) Food Reuben Moose Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Almond

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Reuben Moose

 Case: 2-A Row-1 (South) Food Almond Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose Reuben

Note: All the above cases are possible; only if two people are sit between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. If there is vacant seat in between, then the position of the one like Reuben gets changed, with that all the others position also gets changed.

References

The one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.

The one who like Fish and the one who like Bread sits diagonally opposite to each other.

The one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish.

The one who like Corn and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to each other.

Vacant seats are not in the extreme end.

Inferences

From above statements,

• By combining all above information, the following seating we obtained are
• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme end.
1. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
2. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme right end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is not possible.
3. If the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2, then the one who like Corn sits second to the right of the one who like Fish is possible. But all the 5 seats (In Row-2) from left are filled by this statement. Then the vacant seat comes at extreme right end, which is not possible. So Case-1 is not possible with respect to above statements.

Note: All the above conditions explained (the one who like Fish, at end) is applicable for all above 4 cases. It means that, we can’t continue all the above 4 cases as it is. From, here we clearly observe that the vacant seat is in between the one who like Reuben and the one who like Moose. So we have to change all above 4 cases (1, 1-A, 2 & 2-A) with respect to the one who like Reuben.

• In Case (1), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-2. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-1 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving]

 Case: 1 Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Reuben Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (1-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 1-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Reuben/ Ostrich Moose/Bread Persons Persons Neel Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case (2), the one who like Fish is sit at extreme left end of Row-1. Then Neel likes Corn. The one who like Bread is sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and the one who like Ostrich sits opposite to Neel. [Note: Position of the one who like Reuben & others are changed from initial solving ]

 Case: 2 Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case (2-A), both possibilities as above explained are not possible. If we not shifted the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Ostrich & Bread as shown in table. If we shift the position of the one who like Reuben, then there is no place for Neel. So this case is not possible in either way, hence it can be eliminated.

 Case: 2-A [Eliminated] Row-1 (South) Food Almond Corn Fish Persons Isaac Neel Persons Food Row-2 (North) Moose/ Bread Reuben / Ostrich

Note: Out of 4 cases, two are eliminated and two (Case-1 & 2) are left to continue.

References

Laksh sits second to the right of Row-1, vacant seat.

Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast.

The one who like Toast and the one who like Gumbo sits opposite to each other.

Inferences

From above statements,

• In Case-1, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 3rd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 3rd from the right end.
• Laksh sits on the immediate right of the one who like Ostrich.
• Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 1 [Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Moose Ostrich Vacant Reuben Bread Persons Laksh Persons Neel Vacant Isaac Food Row-2 (North) Fish Corn Almond

• In Case-2, we get two possibilities for vacant seats in both rows as shown in table. The vacant seat in Row-1 is 4th from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 4th from the right end. Laksh likes Almond sit extreme right end of Row-1. Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. Here no place for Jason as per the statement. Hence this can be eliminated.

 Case: 2[Eliminated] Jason sits third to the right of the one who like Toast. No place for Jason in either of the rows Row-1 (South) Food Almond Vacant Corn Fish Persons Laksh Isaac Neel Persons Vacant Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Ostrich Moose

• In Case-2-B, the vacant seat in Row-1 is 2nd from the left end and vacant seat in Row-2 is 2nd from the right end. Laksh sits on the immediate right of Neel. Here Jason likes Moose sit at extreme right end of the Row-2. Laksh like Gumbo and sits opposite to the one who like Toast.

By using above all information, we get the following case-2-B as shown below.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Isaac Laksh Neel Persons Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose

References

Samar sits second to the left of Kabir and does not like either Reuben or Gumbo.

Only one person sits between Amol and Ranbir.

Ranbir sits opposite to the one who is an immediate neighbor of Farhan.

Inferences

From above statements

• Samar likes Bread & sit at extreme left end of Row-2 and Kabir likes Toast (Only possibility)
• Ranbir likes Reuben and Amol likes Ostrich (Only possibility with 3rd reference pint)
• Farhan likes Almond and his immediate neighbor is Isaac & Isaac faces Ranbir. So the given condition satisfied.
• Finally, Isaac likes Hot Dogs and Darsh likes Fish. Thus we get completed arrangement of all persons.

 Case: 2-B Row-1 (South) Food Almond Hot Dogs Gumbo Corn Vacant Fish Persons Farhan Isaac Laksh Neel Darsh Persons Samar Ranbir Kabir Amol Vacant Jason Food Row-2 (North) Bread Reuben Toast Ostrich Moose
##### You may also like to study

Seating Arrangement Puzzle Quiz No. 62

Seating Arrangement is one of the topics that forms the base of any bank examination. Be it IBPS PO or SBI PO, IBPS Clerk or SBI Clerk, RRB Office Assistant or RRB Officer Scale I, RBI Grade B or IBPS SO. Not just in bank exams, but Insurance sector exams also feature questions on seating arrangement. Seating arrangement questions are commonly seen in exams like NIACL Assistant Pre, NIACL Assistant Mains, LIC HFL, UIIC etc.  At this page, you will get all the questions based on new pattern seating arrangement that has been asked in several exams like SBI Clerk Mains 2018, SBI PO Mains 2018 and RRB Office Assistant Mains 2018. Seating arrangement questions are completely based on verbal reasoning where questions are solved by applying verbal statements in a logical order. You can find new pattern seating arrangement questions with solutions that can help you to derive at the answer quickly. The unmatched explanations will help the aspirants to build their concepts. In seating arrangement questions the most important point is to build a strategy for which the given information is to be utilized in a logical manner. It is very important to use the direct hints first and then put up the other information. After placing the direct hints, use the information connected with the direct hints to get the answer. This strategy will help to reach the answer in fastest possible time, which is the key to crack a competitive exam. In SBI Clerk Mains 2018, the major portion of the reasoning section was occupied with seating arrangements. There were almost all types of seating arrangement questions like Linear seating arrangement, Circular seating arrangement, Floor based seating arrangement and Rectangular seating arrangement. So, this itself tells the importance of Seating arrangement questions in upcoming bank exams, insurance exams and even CLAT 2019. Practice one test daily at www.smartkeeda.com to achieve excellence and master the critical topic of reasoning i.e. Seating Arrangement. Here, you will get linear seating arrangement questions, circular seating arrangement questions, floor based seating arrangement and rectangular based seating arrangement questions with detailed solutions. Take one quiz daily to build a strong command over all types of seating arrangement questions because in today’s competition age it is essential to have good command over all the four sections that come in bank exams. Start your preparation with the most relevant questions at www.smartkeeda.com and don’t forget to attempt test series on IBPS PO Pre+Mains, IBOS Clerk Pre+Mains available at testzone.