Reasoning Questions for SBI PO 2019 | Reasoning Seating Arrangement Puzzle for SBI PO 2019 at Smartkeeda

Directions: Study the following information carefully and choose the right answer for the question given below.

8 friends A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H sit around a circular table facing inside and like basketball, football, cricket, badminton, kho kho, table tennis, hockey, and volleyball.

The one who likes football sit between C and E. H sits 2nd to the right of the friend who likes basketball. B is the neighbour of the one who likes basketball. The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G. E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F. A and D both don’t like either badminton or table tennis.  G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball. F doesn’t like football. B likes hockey.
» Explain it
C
From the given solution H likes Badminton.

Hence the correct answer is option C.

Final Arrangement:




Common Explanation:

Reference:

H sits 2nd to the right of the friend who likes basketball.

B is the neighbour of the one who likes basketball.

B likes hockey.

Inference:

For the position of B there could be 2 possible cases-

Case 1:
 

Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of E and C there are 3 possible sub cases:

Case 1.a:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.
 

 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

Since A and D both don’t like badminton this case is invalid.

Case 1.b:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

This case is invalid as position of G and the one who likes table tennis cannot be fixed.

Case 1.c:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.
 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

 Since A and D both don’t like Table tennis this case is invalid.

Case 2:


Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of C and E there are 2 sub cases:

Case 2.a:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.


Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis.

Inference:

From the above condition A and D either likes volleyball or football and H likes badminton.
 

Case 2.b:



Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

From the above condition position of G and the one who likes volleyball cannot be fixed. Hence this case is invalid.
 

Case 2.a is the final arrangement.
2
Who sits between the one who likes Basketball and the one who likes Football?
» Explain it
A
G sits between the one who likes Basketball and the one who likes Football.

Hence the correct answer is option A.

Final Arrangement:




Common Explanation:

Reference:

H sits 2nd to the right of the friend who likes basketball.

B is the neighbour of the one who likes basketball.

B likes hockey.

Inference:

For the position of B there could be 2 possible cases-

Case 1:
 

Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of E and C there are 3 possible sub cases:

Case 1.a:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.
 

 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

Since A and D both don’t like badminton this case is invalid.

Case 1.b:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

This case is invalid as position of G and the one who likes table tennis cannot be fixed.

Case 1.c:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.
 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

 Since A and D both don’t like Table tennis this case is invalid.

Case 2:


Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of C and E there are 2 sub cases:

Case 2.a:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.


Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis.

Inference:

From the above condition A and D either likes volleyball or football and H likes badminton.
 

Case 2.b:



Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

From the above condition position of G and the one who likes volleyball cannot be fixed. Hence this case is invalid.
 

Case 2.a is the final arrangement.
» Explain it
E
From the given solution A likes either Volleyball or Football.

Hence the correct answer is option E.

Final Arrangement:




Common Explanation:

Reference:

H sits 2nd to the right of the friend who likes basketball.

B is the neighbour of the one who likes basketball.

B likes hockey.

Inference:

For the position of B there could be 2 possible cases-

Case 1:
 

Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of E and C there are 3 possible sub cases:

Case 1.a:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.
 

 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

Since A and D both don’t like badminton this case is invalid.

Case 1.b:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

This case is invalid as position of G and the one who likes table tennis cannot be fixed.

Case 1.c:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.
 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

 Since A and D both don’t like Table tennis this case is invalid.

Case 2:


Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of C and E there are 2 sub cases:

Case 2.a:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.


Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis.

Inference:

From the above condition A and D either likes volleyball or football and H likes badminton.
 

Case 2.b:



Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

From the above condition position of G and the one who likes volleyball cannot be fixed. Hence this case is invalid.
 

Case 2.a is the final arrangement.
4
Who sits 2nd to the right of F?
» Explain it
E
Either A or D sits 2nd to the right of F.

Hence the correct answer is option E.

Final Arrangement:




Common Explanation:

Reference:

H sits 2nd to the right of the friend who likes basketball.

B is the neighbour of the one who likes basketball.

B likes hockey.

Inference:

For the position of B there could be 2 possible cases-

Case 1:
 

Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of E and C there are 3 possible sub cases:

Case 1.a:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.
 

 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

Since A and D both don’t like badminton this case is invalid.

Case 1.b:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

This case is invalid as position of G and the one who likes table tennis cannot be fixed.

Case 1.c:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.
 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

 Since A and D both don’t like Table tennis this case is invalid.

Case 2:


Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of C and E there are 2 sub cases:

Case 2.a:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.


Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis.

Inference:

From the above condition A and D either likes volleyball or football and H likes badminton.
 

Case 2.b:



Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

From the above condition position of G and the one who likes volleyball cannot be fixed. Hence this case is invalid.
 

Case 2.a is the final arrangement.
5
How many friend(s) sit between F and the one who likes Football when counted in anticlockwise direction from F ?
» Explain it
B
From the given solution 2 people sit between F and the one who likes Football.

Hence the correct answer is option B.

Final Arrangement:




Common Explanation:

Reference:

H sits 2nd to the right of the friend who likes basketball.

B is the neighbour of the one who likes basketball.

B likes hockey.

Inference:

For the position of B there could be 2 possible cases-

Case 1:
 

Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of E and C there are 3 possible sub cases:

Case 1.a:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.
 

 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

Since A and D both don’t like badminton this case is invalid.

Case 1.b:
 

Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

This case is invalid as position of G and the one who likes table tennis cannot be fixed.

Case 1.c:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.
 
Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis. 

Inference:

 Since A and D both don’t like Table tennis this case is invalid.

Case 2:


Reference:

The one who likes football sit between C and E.

E likes cricket and sits immediate right of F.

F don’t like football.

Inference:

For the position of C and E there are 2 sub cases:

Case 2.a:


Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

Position of G and the one who likes Football can be fixed.


Reference:

A and D both don’t like neither badminton nor table tennis.

Inference:

From the above condition A and D either likes volleyball or football and H likes badminton.
 

Case 2.b:



Reference:

G likes kho kho and sits 2nd to the right of the one who likes volleyball.

The friend who likes table tennis sits opposite to G.

Inference:

From the above condition position of G and the one who likes volleyball cannot be fixed. Hence this case is invalid.
 

Case 2.a is the final arrangement.

Seating Arrangement Puzzle Quiz No. 63
 
Seating Arrangement is one of the topics that forms the base of any bank examination. Be it SBI PO or IBPS PO, IBPS Clerk or SBI Clerk, RRB Office Assistant or RRB Officer Scale I, RBI Grade B or IBPS SO. Not just in bank exams, but Insurance sector exams also feature questions on seating arrangement. Seating arrangement questions are commonly seen in exams like NIACL Assistant Pre, NIACL Assistant Mains, LIC HFL, UIIC etc.  At this page, you will get all the questions based on new pattern seating arrangement that has been asked in several exams like SBI Clerk Mains 2018, SBI PO Mains 2018 and RRB Office Assistant Mains 2018. Seating arrangement questions are completely based on verbal reasoning where questions are solved by applying verbal statements in a logical order. You can find new pattern seating arrangement questions with solutions that can help you to derive at the answer quickly. The unmatched explanations will help the aspirants to build their concepts. In seating arrangement questions the most important point is to build a strategy for which the given information is to be utilized in a logical manner. It is very important to use the direct hints first and then put up the other information. After placing the direct hints, use the information connected with the direct hints to get the answer. This strategy will help to reach the answer in fastest possible time, which is the key to crack a competitive exam. In SBI Clerk Mains 2018, the major portion of the reasoning section was occupied with seating arrangements. There were almost all types of seating arrangement questions like Linear seating arrangement, Circular seating arrangement, Floor based seating arrangement and Rectangular seating arrangement. So, this itself tells the importance of Seating arrangement questions in upcoming bank exams, insurance exams and even CLAT 2019. Practice one test daily at www.smartkeeda.com to achieve excellence and master the critical topic of reasoning i.e. Seating Arrangement. Here, you will get linear seating arrangement questions, circular seating arrangement questions, floor based seating arrangement and rectangular based seating arrangement questions with detailed solutions. Take one quiz daily to build a strong command over all types of seating arrangement questions because in today’s competition age it is essential to have good command over all the four sections that come in bank exams. Start your preparation with the most relevant questions at www.smartkeeda.com and don’t forget to attempt test series on SBI PO Pre+Mains, SBI Clerk Pre+Mains and IBPS PO Pre+Mains, IBPS Clerk Pre+Mains available at testzone.